Preventing Torque Overloads with Mechanical Limiters


Engineers working at robotic companies, auto makers, automatic equipment manufacturers and in many other industries all commonly use torque overload protection devices, slip clutches or torque limiters. They design in limiters to prevent accidental collisions between robots and other moving machines, to avoid overloads on production and assembly machines, and to keep drives and speed reducers safe. All of these collisions or overloads lead to machine downtime, along with the associated higher maintenance costs and lower productivity.

This Rencol tolerance ring uses spring force and friction as its operating principle but is not an actual Friction Type torque limiter. It gets installed coaxially into a drive instead of being installed in series with an assembly. It surface waves provide a radial force which acts as the spring force to create friction between components.

Torque Protection

There are two types of torque overload protection: mechanical and electrical. This article focuses on mechanical protection. That’s because mechanical torque limiters are quicker at providing overload protection than electrical versions. In some cases, protection is supplied within milliseconds of the torque overload by mechanical limiters. Electrical limiters require sensors and other electrical devices to detect and monitor torque overloads. And finally, mechanical limiters are much less costly and simpler to install and use.

Mechanical torque limiters, which provide slip clutch functionality, fall in one of four types: friction, shear pin, ball or roller release detent. There are also pneumatic and hydraulic type torque limiters.

Friction type torque limiter.Friction type torque limiter.

Friction type. This type of torque limiter uses spring loaded friction disks that act on one another, similar to an automobile clutch. Adjusting the spring-force preload on the disks determines the limiter’s torque slip threshold. Under normal torque load conditions, the limiter transmits the entire amount of torque. If the torque exceeds the threshold, the friction disks slip against each other to bleed off or eliminate some of the torque. This type of torque limiter lowers the torque almost immediately when a higher level of torque is applied.

Shear pin type torque limiter.Shear pin type torque limiter.

Shear-pin type. In these torque limiters, metal shear pins connect two rotating bodies and a constant shear force is applied to these shear pins when torque is transmitted. Under normal torque loads, these limiters let it all be transmitted. When there’s an overload, the shear pins break and all torque transmission stops. The shear pins must be replaced after an overload. It is also difficult to accurately control the level of torque at which the shear pin will reliably and consistently break.

Ball and detent type torque limiter.Ball and detent type torque limiter.

Ball or roller release detent type. In one of these limiters, a series of balls or rollers in one rotating body are matched with mating sockets or detents in the other rotating body. The balls or rollers are spring loaded to remain in their mating sockets or detents. Under normal torque loads, the limiter transmits all of it. In an overload, the centrifugal force on the balls or rollers overcome the spring forces and they disengage with their mating sockets or detents, preventing any torque from being transmitted until the torque drops and the balls are recaptured by the sockets or detents.

Pneumatic and hydraulic type. These limiters use pneumatic or hydraulic pressure to put force on the elements transmitting torque. These torque limiters tend to be complex and expensive and are not frequently used unless there is a special or compelling reason to do so.

Specifying Torque Limiters

The main criterion for specifying a torque limiter is the torque value threshold at which the limiter should slip or disengage. This value can be determined by the following equation:

T = [HP × (5,252/RPM)] / 0.73756

Where:

T = Torque (Newton-meters).

HP = Motor’s horsepower.

RPM = Revolutions per minute at the location where the torque limiter would be located in the system.

Here is an example: If you have a motor rated at 2 HP and there is a 1,800 RPM rotational speed where the torque limiter would be located, the torque is calculated as follows: Torque (in N-m) = [2 × (5,252/1,800)] / 0.73756 = 7.91 N-m.

And if ft-lb is the unit for torque, convert N-m to ft-lb by the following formula: Ft-lb = N-m × 0.73756 (or N-m = ft-lb/0.73756).

For electric motors, horsepower can be calculated from the motor’s torque and speed ratings. For example, if the motor is rated for 2,000 RPM and 4 N-m of torque, horsepower is calculated as follows:

Horsepower = (4 × 0.73756) / (5,252 / 2,000) = 1.123

Motors are also commonly rated in watts. The conversion from watts to horsepower is: 745.7 Watts = 1 HP, or 1 W = (1/745.7) HP

Engineers can also apply a safety factor to create a safety margin for the drive motor. Keep in mind that a safety factor is different from a motor’s Service Factor.

NEMA Standard MG 1-2014 defines a Service Factor as: “A multiplier which, when applied to rated power, indicates a permissible power loading that may be carried under conditions specified for the service factor.” NEMA’s definition of Service Factor also contains the phrase “normal service conditions.” These conditions include rated voltage and frequency at a maximum temperature of 40°C (104°F) and a maximum altitude of 3,300 ft (1,000 m). Only under these conditions can the motor handle the full Service Factor overload. NEMA also warns that even if the motor can perform successfully at ±10% of the rated voltage, operating it at other than the rated voltages may affect motor performance. The decision to apply a safety factor, if any, is solely the responsibility of the end-user.

The torque limiter should have a torque threshold that lets it slip only at torques higher than those the motor generates when first beginning to move. No one wants unnecessary and nuisance slipping when a machine or robot starts up, as this creates unnecessary and costly downtime.

Other Considerations

Another consideration is the amount of space available for the torque limiting device. Depending on the application, there will be varying degrees of space available and design flexibility for adding a torque limiter. The torque limiter should be between the speed reduction unit ( a gearbox, harmonic drive, gear reduction unit or other speed reduction component) and whatever is being driven. This lets it protect both the motor and speed reduction device.

Another consideration is the reset style of the limiter. Do you want to require human intervention for resetting it? Although this adds downtime, some engineers might want this option. If this is the case, then a shear pin limiter might be the best choice as it always needs human intervention to restart. However, if you want to automatically or immediately re-start, a friction type or a ball or roller detent type would do the trick.

By doing calculations to determine the torque value threshold at which the limiter should slip or disengage, designers and engineers can determine the torque limiter’s torque-slip capacity. And depending on considerations such as available space, system design flexibility and reset method, they can also determine which torque limiter type would be best suited for a robot or production machine.

 

Kenneth Smith is market development manager for Saint-Gobain, Bearings Strategic Business Unit.



Source link